<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1802&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / inode, storage and perfomance]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1802</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in inode, storage and perfomance.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2017 05:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[inode, storage and perfomance]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=6878#p6878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I started selecting &#039;news&#039; when I know my VM is going to run off SSD instead of HDD.</p><p>Then, I am wondering if doing the same on HDD would also be a reasonable choice - especially when the HDD is a RAID-10.<br />The VM manager, whatever that is, going to submit low-level operations to the host so it should make no practical difference what allocation you chose.</p><p>This COULD be comparative when you are thinking about using WD Blue for high-performance VMs. If you RAID them up large blocks of writes might not be as bad as suspected.</p><p>Any thoughts?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (alluredbit)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2017 05:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=6878#p6878</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
