<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://dev1galaxy.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1107&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Dev1 Galaxy Forum / [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
		<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1107</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5074#p5074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<h5>initramfs-tools emits bug message</h5><p>I was eventually able to make this work by </p><ol class="decimal"><li><p>clearing out /var/lib/initramfs-tools per PeteGozz. (Didn&#039;t even know that was there. No idea why I needed to clean it out, but it did remove cruft.)</p></li><li><p>using &quot;update-initramfs -k 4.12.0 -ut&quot;. Did not work without the -t parameter, even after emptying /var/lib/initramfs-tools. After doing this once, I was able to delete the -t parameter</p></li></ol><p>This has the feeling that perhaps consistency checks have become a little too strict, and might be relaxed to accept a wider variety of invocations while still producing valid results.</p><h5>xfce only has 1280x1024 resolution</h5><p>See <a href="https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1498" rel="nofollow">[SOLVED] XFCE (Really Xorg) Max Resolution Problem</a></p><h5>network-manager ends up being installed</h5><p>Probably pilot error. Somewhere along the line in later installation attempts, network-manager did not end up being installed, even after removing the hold suggested by PeteGozz.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bbatten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=5074#p5074</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4078#p4078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bbatten wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Well, thanks to Pete Gozz, golinux, and miroR</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It&#039;s always a pleasure when one can be at least somewhat useful...</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>For item two - the display resolution, I&#039;m starting a separate thread in the &quot;Desktop and MultiMedia&quot; section.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I read <a href="https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1498" rel="nofollow">that other topic</a>, don&#039;t have any clues...<br />Just, my best monitor currently is max 1024x768 <img src="http://dev1galaxy.org/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /><br />Ah, never mind.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (miroR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4078#p4078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4050#p4050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, thanks to Pete Gozz, golinux, and miroR, items one and three in my original post are good enough. For item two - the display resolution, I&#039;m starting a separate thread in the &quot;Desktop and MultiMedia&quot; section.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bbatten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=4050#p4050</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3167#p3167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I mean I had it in my somewhat concurrent topic of the title &quot;...broken packages... (Beware of Debian Stretch)&quot;</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (miroR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3167#p3167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3166#p3166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m 1) a little uncomfortable browsing, have only text browser Lynx,<br />2) work to do compiling Palemoon on my not-so-usual-setup system</p><p>But just this error:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><div class="codebox"><pre><code>&quot;E: Internal Error, No file name for initramfs-tools:amd64&quot;</code></pre></div></div></blockquote></div><p> I had it, even though because of 1) above it may not show, just last night. That will solve once you, <strong>possibly</strong> (I don&#039;t guarrantie it!) install the &lt;whatever the package that did not install properly&gt; with </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/&lt;that-full-name-binary&gt;</code></pre></div><p> . Duckduckgo.com for it...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (miroR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3166#p3166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3152#p3152</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bbatten wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Hi PeteGozz,</p><p>Thanks for the feedback. Any ideas, pointers, tips on how I can fix up my xfce install?</p><p>Thanks,</p></div></blockquote></div><p>If you&#039;re referring to the resolution issue, try xrandr.&#160; Actually lxrandr has a nice gui selector.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (golinux)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3152#p3152</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3149#p3149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi PeteGozz,</p><p>Thanks for the feedback. Any ideas, pointers, tips on how I can fix up my xfce install?</p><p>Thanks,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bbatten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3149#p3149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3093#p3093</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bbatten wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>initramfs-tools emits bug message</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This _may_ be as simple as /var/lib/initramfs-tools/&#160; &#160;uuid records<br />&#160; &#160;not being cleaned up <br />&#160; &#160;by kernel installs/upgrades<br />&#160; (as you roll your own)</p><p>I have been caught by that.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/
ls /boot/init*</code></pre></div><p>maybe a hand run:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>1 [root@lenny]: /etc/apt/preferences.d$ update-initramfs -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.11.6-lenny
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/sda3
I: (UUID=9e5238ff-0ece-4e6e-9039-e8952c42b3aa)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.</code></pre></div><p>Which brings me to :</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>bbatten wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Second, why is initramfs-tools being run in the first place? I</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It will also be called whenever anything needs a:<br />&#160; &#160; kernel __module__ new OR updated&#160; (say ext* at least )<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; certainly md or btrfs<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; or a new blockdev label or uuid <br />&#160; anything&#160; that may upset grubs world. (yeah I know)<br />&#160; X nonsense like vid drivers and evdev <br />&#160; Or firmware updates. Busybox uclib etc. </p><p> On random Tuesdays&#160; Full Moons ...</p><p>A lot has happened since wheezy so <br />I am surprised you only got this many issues !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (PeteGozz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3093#p3093</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: [SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3092#p3092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bbatten wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>network-manager ends up being installed</p><p>I don&#039;t know why this happened, but this and network-manager-gnome were both installed. My understanding is that &#039;upgrade&#039; installs newest versions of currently installed packages while &#039;dist-upgrade&#039; also installs dependencies. Doesn&#039;t seem that either of these should end up installing a package that&#039;s not currently installed.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>dist-upgrade WILL install extra packages.</p><p>I&#039;m guessing but its possibly because xfce =&gt; task-*-desktop&#160; (something) pulls it in.<br />network-manager has a long rev depends list.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>apt-cache showpkg network-manager-gnome</p></div></blockquote></div><p>(there is probably a more elegant method)</p><p>If you can purge it without uninstalling half your system<br />then do that and try:<br /> (you don&#039;t really need most desktop meta-packages any more)</p><p>/etc/apt/preferences.d/network-messwithya</p><p>that looks something like this:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Package: network-manager
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority: -15

Package: network-manager
Pin: release o=Devuan
Pin-Priority: -10</code></pre></div><p>test with</p><p>$ apt-cache policy network-manager<br />it *should* report no candidates <br />e.g.</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>[root@lenny]: /etc/apt/preferences.d$ apt-cache policy network-manager
network-manager:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:
     1.8.0-5 -10
        500 http://au.mirror.devuan.org/merged ceres/main i386 Packages
     1.6.2-3 -10
        500 http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged ascii/main i386 Packages
     0.9.10.0-7+devuan1 -10
        990 http://packages.devuan.org/devuan jessie/main i386 Packages
        990 http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged jessie/main i386 Packages</code></pre></div><p>Then when I try to install:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>[root@lenny]: /etc/apt/preferences.d$ apt-get install network-manager
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package network-manager is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source</code></pre></div><p>You _may_ have to do the same for gnome-network-manager<br />OR try a regex match</p><p> i.e. <strong> /network-manager/&#160; *should* match any version. </strong></p><p>(and if I were you I would do something similar for grub)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (PeteGozz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3092#p3092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] Post Install Config Problems]]></title>
			<link>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3085#p3085</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded my Wheezy installation to Devuan Jessie using the instructions at<br /><a href="https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170525.180739.f86cd310.en.html" rel="nofollow">https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/2 … 10.en.html</a><br />with these package sources:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>deb [arch=amd64,i386] <a href="http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged</a> jessie&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; main contrib non-free<br />deb [arch=amd64,i386] <a href="http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged</a> jessie-updates&#160; main contrib non-free<br />deb [arch=amd64,i386] <a href="http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged" rel="nofollow">http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged</a> jessie-security main contrib non-free</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The configuration I&#039;m trying to upgrade is Debian Wheezy. I have no Debian kernel packages. I download kernels from kernel.org and build from source. Network-manager is not installed. I use a custom network configuration and wicd instead. My boot manager is lilo. Grub is not installed.</p><p>I used a terminal window from my xfce desktop to do the installation, which at first appeared successful, but which I soon discovered has the following problem areas:</p><ol class="decimal"><li><p>initramfs-tools emits bug message</p></li><li><p>xfce only has 1280x1024 resolution</p></li><li><p>network-manager ends up being installed</p></li></ol><p>Cumulatively, these resulted in an unusable desktop and a non-functioning local network configuration serious enough that I needed to drop back to a backup disk image of Wheezy. Here&#039;s what I know about these problems:</p><h5>initramfs-tools emits bug message</h5><p>When initramfs-tools setup started, these messages were issued:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.120+deb8u3) ...<br />update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4<br />mkinitramfs: failed to determine device for /<br />mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most, check:<br />grep -r MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/</p><p>Error please report bug on initramfs-tools<br />Include the output of &#039;mount&#039; and &#039;cat /proc/mounts&#039;<br />update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4 with 1.<br />dpkg: error processing package initramfs-tools (--configure):<br /> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1<br />Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u9) ...<br />Errors were encountered while processing:<br /> initramfs-tools<br />E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)<br />update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.11.4 with 1.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I tried unsuccessfully (pilot error suspected) to use reportbug to report it.</p><p>Trying to install initramfs-tools separately resulted in this error:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>&quot;E: Internal Error, No file name for initramfs-tools:amd64&quot;</p></div></blockquote></div><p>First, I don&#039;t have kernel 4.11.4 installed. I do have 4.11.7 installed. Second, why is initramfs-tools being run in the first place? I haven&#039;t called out for any kernel packages to be installed, so the boot configuration is unchanged.</p><h5>xfce only has 1280x1024 resolution</h5><p>Xfce4 gets upgraded from 4.8 to 4.10 (good). When I logged into my upgaded xfce4 desktop, I found that it was set at 1280x1024. My display has 1920x1080 capability, which was being used prior to the upgrade. Running &#039;xfce4-display-settings&#039; did not offer the option of 1920x1080. Furthermore, I found that my displays.xml file had been modified to change name=&quot;Default&quot; with Resolution of 1920x1080 to name=&quot;active&quot; (I think), then *append* a name=&quot;Default&quot; set of properties with a max Resolution of 1280x1024. Running &quot;xfce4-display-settings&quot; did not allow me to increase the resolution above 1280x1024, even though the former &quot;Default&quot; Resolution continued show as 1920x1280.</p><p>My understanding is the it is conventional *not* to modify user specified settings. Getting back to a full display capability is something I need to be able to do before entering the fray once more.</p><h5>network-manager ends up being installed</h5><p>I don&#039;t know why this happened, but this and network-manager-gnome were both installed. My understanding is that &#039;upgrade&#039; installs newest versions of currently installed packages while &#039;dist-upgrade&#039; also installs dependencies. Doesn&#039;t seem that either of these should end up installing a package that&#039;s not currently installed. </p><p>Anyway, I need to know how to keep Network Manager out of my system in order to be able to proceed.</p><p>Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bbatten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2017 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3085#p3085</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
